New Yorker posted extensive profile on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg today. The profile enjoys Zuckerberg's board game and victory, his role to make decisive decisions under Facebook control. For Apple, the profile records how Apple's decision affects Facebook.
Sylvania Home Kit Light Strip
In July, Facebook acted against Alex Jones and Infowars after putting pressure on the spread of Jones' Sandy Hook conspiracy theory. But it was relatively basic punishment. Facebook deleted 4 videos of Johns and gave a one month ban period despite requesting continuation of permanent ban.
One week after Facebook's initial decision, Apple announced that he removed five Infowars podcasts with discriminatory remarks. Shortly, Facebook announced Jones' ban. And Zuckerberg admits that the decision was influenced by Apple.
Zuckerberg explains that Facebook does not ban people "unless it triggers direct violence." When a decision against Apple's Jones is made, Facebook wonders what the user's interest in Jones's older articles is raised I was planning to keep it.
" initial He added, "Unless we induce violence directly, we will rob it and not ban people." He said that after Jones had declined, his complaints were overwhelmed, and Facebook warned the old article, the company was discussing what to do when Apple announced the ban.
Zuckerberg said, "When they move, like O. K, you should not just sit on this content and these enforcement decisions." We should shift to what we know we are in breach of policy. Now we need to make a decision. "
The complete work from The New Yorker is definitely worthwhile …