Following a measure adopted by the National Assembly, South Korea may be on its way to amending its Communications Trade Act to prevent Apple and Google from gaining a share of in-app sales. The bill was voted on by national legislation and the judiciary on Thursday, but it still has to hold a final vote in parliament, which is set for Monday.
If passed, a tweak to the Terms would mean that companies with major market positions – such as Apple and Google – would not allow you to require software developers on their platforms to select payment plans of the app store for users to record payment-for applications or make in-app purchases.
The move comes after Google informed Korean devs in September last year that they would need to “use the Google Play payment system when offering in-app purchases of digital goods and pay a portion of the purchase price as a fee. ” In a replay tone, he added that the policy “only applies to at least 3 percent of Google Play application developers who agbara charge users for payment records or sell digital goods within the app . Google Play believes this policy is legitimate. ”
Professor Bronwen Dalton, of the University of Sydney School of Technology, said of the transfer: Google. Apple wins lawsuit against Corellium as iOS platform dictatorship looks more precarious. South Korea table rules to eliminate monopoly purchases in-app stores. The London class-action sueball against Google is much like the Epic case unless fanndroids can win enough for a pint. The good news: Apple is also charging a fee for real-time online experiences. “Another issue is that Korean companies are looking to adopt the same approach. Like Apple and Google, they also want to build ecosystems where their company… plays a leading role in applications, systems, payment systems and services.
“If approved, the [amendments to the] The Communications Trade Act would mean that Korea would be the first such barrier [to] these two US players about a major economy and market. Of course Apple and Google are worried that this could pave the way for other countries to do the same. Even the loss of Korea would mean the loss of a huge revenue stream. ”
Dalton also noted that the passage of the law could also have implications for the development of automobiles in Korea. Hyundai Motor, Kia, and Hyundai Mobis are in talks with several manufacturers to develop AVs – reportedly shutting down discussions with Apple in February. He adds: “While the internal combustion industry has allowed for some ecological monopoly, development costs [for electric] is large and Korea will have to cooperate with companies with other technologies.
“Collaboration with technology giants like Apple will be even more important in the era of EVs and AVs. Them [amendment to the] Trade Law Communications could be a mess with Korean corporations’ [ability] to make strategic partnerships with US technology companies they need to develop the AV car industry. ”While increasing criticism against the payment methods used by Google and Apple in lawsuits around the world has been widely criticized by other founders, consumers and government regulators, the companies themselves have defended the bill. revenue generated by their stores, saying they used to maintain strong. software security and payment transfers and other expenses on platforms. Both Google and Apple have also made transfers to reduce the share of revenue they receive from app users to 15 per cent for smaller advertisers (defined as those making under $ 1m annually).
A Dev who certainly does not fit into this category, Fortnite Creator and Games Epic Tracker Engine Engineer, refused to pay 30 percent of in-app payments to Google and Apple to the point that in August last year, he violated the big companies’ respectively Play and App Store rules by creating a loophole for players to buy in-game currency without using Cupertino and Mountain View’s payment systems, thereby locking them out to increase a share of revenue.
The move led to the developer launching out of both stores, following which it filed a lawsuit against Apple and Google. [PDF]. It has been alleged in both cases that both Google and Apple are abusing the leading positions and citing competitive practices by both technology giants. The Apple v Epic trial has uncovered its final arguments by the end of May this year (this is the acquisition of Reg) and is awaiting trial in the Federal Court of Oakland by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The Google vs Epic trial is ongoing.
Google has also proposed class actions from customers and developers to address, and implementation actions by general lawyers, all accusing a company of monopolizing the product for distributing applications on Android devices via Play your store. A senior Google policy executive told Reuters yesterday that “speed regulation does not allow for a sufficient analysis of the negative impact of this law on Korean customers and app developers.”
Other critics have suggested that the move by lawmakers in Korea – as well as other opposition moves around the world – could affect trade agreements with the United States. In any case, devs in Korea and elsewhere will listen closely on Monday for the rattle of keys to consumers’ online wallets. ® Research: Key Assemblies for Scanning SD-WAN Platforms