Apple has paid $ 300 Million in Optis Experiment, Google violated Smart Speaker patents

Apple has ordered Optis to pay $ 300 million for a 4G LTE patent violation, while Sonos has filed a preliminary patent lawsuit against Google. If convicted after a full investigation, many of Google’s products, including smart speakers, Chromecast, and Pixel phones, could become paper weights. Optis vs. Apple Corps was awarded a $ 300 million paycheck over the weekend. The company must now pay the money to Optis Wireless, a group of companies that includes PanOptis Patent Management, Optis Cellular, and Planet Unwired. The reward is much lower than the original distribution order of $ 506 million, which was released regularly a year ago. Optis has accused Apple of violating its proprietary wireless technology, which is used in the 4G capabilities of iPhones, iPads, and iPod Touch.

Apple then vowed to fight back and so on for that decision. The company said, “Complaints like this by companies that compile patent plots to corrupt the company only serve to detract and hurt customers.” This is Apple’s way of calling Optis as a troll patent. See Also: What’s Going Wrong at Apple These Days? Following Apple’s appeal, U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap upheld the lawsuit but ordered a review to determine the amount of a review fee for a violation of five Optis patents. These five LTE patents are patent-pending and received by Optis between 2014 and 2017 from Samsung, LG, and Panasonic. According to the judge, the judge failed to consider “discrimination, prejudice, and impartiality,” or the FRAND actions required in special patent cases. All of these patents are essential to the implementation of 4G LTE in mobile devices.

A new jury in a patent dispute has found Apple liable to pay $ 300 million to Optis. $ 300 million is not a small amount but for Apple, it is just one of its big words. Just for appearance, the Cupertino-based company earned $ 81.4 billion in Q2 2021 of which profits were $ 21.74 billion. Obviously the amount, which Apple can get back at least two full days, is not the case. What about Apple is that this could set the stage for Optis and other companies to stay behind. For example, Optis also filed a lawsuit against Apple for patent infringement in the Supreme Court of England. The company is seeking $ 7 billion in damages. But more than that, the company hopes to set a global tax rate for all of its licenses. Currently, FRAND provides a framework for conducting patent-related transactions but the rules are somewhat ambiguous, which has often led to lawsuits. Some lawsuits arising out of deficiencies include FRAND rules for special-patents as well.

If fines are “acceptable in business, Apple threatens to leave the UK market,” according to Bloomberg. Google vs Sonos Google also found that it had violated five certificates issued by Sonos, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) said over the weekend. The verdict was preliminary and did not set in stone but gave Sonos the upper hand for the upcoming proceedings. ITC Judge Charles Bullock found some Google app products as smart speakers to be a derivative of audio streaming technology.

Bullock, who is the chief administrative officer at ITC, supports Sonos recommendations relating to all five patents of corporate rights infringement. Sonos sued Google in January 2020 alleging that hackers stole 9,195,258 US patents; 10,209,953; 9,219,959; 8,588,949; and 10.439,896. Sonos hopes to eliminate financial damage and prevent the importation of Google smart speakers, including other consumer products such as Chromecast and Pixel phones. See Also: The Fourth Season in Charm: EU Ad Google Ad Tech Research on Antitrust Sonos Attitude argues that Google stole the idea when the two were collaborating on designing a music project for Sonos home speakers. Sonos then delivered the design of its new wireless speakers to Google. At that time, Google did not publish any such speakers, and therefore was not a competitor. It became one in 2016 when Google launched its own smart speaker. Sonos in the lawsuit said the following multi-channel wireless audio systems were illegal.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a Reply

      AppleiPhonestop - Apple iPhone News and Rumours All Day
      Logo
      Enable registration in settings - general
      Compare items
      • Laptops (0)
      Compare
      0