Earlier this week, Razer, best known for its notebooks and gaming peripherals, introduced a new eGPU soluti called Razer Core X. Razer already produces an eGPU called Razer Core V2, but the Core X is an ecomical eGPU that is marketed for both Mac and PC users
Compared to the Core V2, the Core X is a more straightforward soluti, avoiding subtleties like USB Ethernet Lighting, RGB and RGB for the benefit of an external graphics soluti Thunderbolt 3 cheaper and more professial
Is the Razer Core X a good soluti for Mac users looking for a better soluti? an eGPU? How is it superimposed the current line of Mac compatible external graphics boxes the market? Watch our cvenient video for details
Synology RT2600ac: The AirPort Extreme Replacement
Specificatis
- Thunderbolt 3 eGPU
- Compatible with PCI-Express graphics cards
- Up to 3-slot graphics card PCI-Express x16 Wide and Full Length
- Plug and Play
- ATX Power Supply 650W
- GPU 500W Support
- Charges USB-C notebooks with power up to 100W [19659007] Mac compatible with Windows
- Tool-less design with quick-release lever
- Includes power cable and Thunderbolt 3 cable
- Price: $ 299.99
- Length: 12.99 "/ 330 mm
- Height *: 6.29" / 160 mm
- Width: 2.36 "/ 60 mm
- 6.61" / 168 mm (width) x 14.72 "/ 374 mm (depth) x 9.06" / 230 mm (Size)
I have lg adm Razer went by far, especially what the company is doing with its laptop business. This is produced …
